| Sigma 14mm f/2.8 EX HSM Specifications | |
| Frame Coverage | 35mm |
| Lens Construction (groups) | 10 |
| Lens Construction (elements) | 14 |
| No. of Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
| Minimum Aperture | 22 |
| Closest Focusing Distance | 0.18m (7.1") |
| Maximum Magnifcation | 0.20x |
| Filter Diameter | N/A (rear gelatin filter) |
| Maximum Diameter x Length | 82mm x 91mm (3.2" x 3.6") |
| Weight | 630g (22.2oz) |
Ready to buy?
Reviews
Source
Ben Long
Overall sharpness and contrast are both excellent, and images have a nicely warm quality, particularly when compared to Canon's 10-22. Color accuracy is very subjective, of course. I've been very pleased with the color tone and quality of the Sigma 14.
Luminous-Landscape.com
If you shoot film, or there's a full-frame digital body in your future, then I can recommend the new Canon wide zoom to you without reservation.
Luminous-Landscape.com
While the Sigma continues to be an inexpensive solution for D60 and D30 owners, with film and with forthcoming full-frame DSLRs, the corner resolution on the Sigma will be found wanting.
Petteri Sulonen
For my particular requirements -- about f/2.8, about this focal length, about this weight, under $1000 -- there isn't another lens currently on the market that I'd rather have.
